| Joe and John have a conversation about the issues with the critical reading and writing class |
|
 | The main issue with the class is that the information is not "cohesive", and the students are not picking it up well. | |
|
| True, maybe if she let the students "collaborate" they would be more compelled to learn the information. | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Josh has some questions about John's ideas, and they talk about how they could improve on his current ideas. |
|
| So John, you believe that if she would "commend" the students for good work, rather than punishing for bad, the students would excel in her class? | |
|
| Yes, and if a student doesn't want to work with others, maybe she would come to the "compromise" of allowing the student to work independently, while listening to music! | |
|
|
|
|
|
| Josh realays the ideas of John to the head office of Critical™. Linda seems to like the ideas. |
|
| So, If she allowed the students to work together on projects, made the material easier to understand, and came to agreements with students if they didn't want to work together, the overall class grades would probably improve, because the students are wanting to learn, rather than dreading it. | |
|
| Well Josh, these seem like great ideas, and I have come to the "consensus" with my associates that we would like to put these ideas into place! | |
|
|
|
|
|
